Rob Savoye wrote: > Markus Gothe wrote: >> Why not just add "`ls /some/path/boost_thread-*.so`" to the list? > > I may wind up doing that, but then I'd have to sort out all the > results and figure out which one is the correct library. As far as I can > tell, there are only a few variations we need to look for, hence the > current implementation. A day or so will probably determine if I have to > change this to doing an ls, and going from there. > > I personally find it quite amazing that for all the "portability" of > Boost, they follow an completely insane way of naming libraries. > I think we are using the wrong approach here Rob. Do we really want to *LINK* against boost when building from source. All the the code is in the headers afaik. I think we should look at other projects using boost on this issue, which needs further investigation.
//Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
