On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:30:42PM +0200, Udo Giacomozzi wrote:

> I think that the plain framebuffer GUI will probably be used only in
> embedded devices. I currently have no idea what other real use it
> could have.

Well, I for one would like to fire gnash/fb from a text-based
browser :)
Also, would be nice to have some videos play on the background while
coding :P

> In the embedded world, each kbyte of RAM is precious and startup time
> is very important. So, if another layer can be avoided it's better.

As you said, we need input  :)

> Anyway, it would not be bad to have a AGG-DirectFB GUI (at least for
> testing).

Agreed.
Maybe we might subclass fbgui so to keep output routines common and only
implement input handling ?

--strk;


_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev

Reply via email to