Hello strk,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 3:09:51 PM, you wrote:
s> I'd like to enable multiple guis build too.
s> I'd name them gtk-gnash, sdl-gnash, fb-gnash etc. etc.
I'd keep "gnash" as the beginning of whatever naming convention
("Klash" and all other variants appear confusing to me). Why not
"gnash-gtk", "gnash-sdl", ...?)
BTW, gtk-gnash is ambiguous (what *renderer* is that?).
s> The rationale is that sometime you really want two or more
s> versions. For example, a framebuffer AND a gtk based gnashes.
Yes, that would be nice :)
s> Also, we know that gtk better integrates into the firefox browser,
s> so it is good if each plugin can call the better integrated gui...
s> We might have a 'gnash' shell script that takes a --gui argument
s> and fails if that gui is not available, and have some smart default
s> like starting the fb gui if not in an X context etc..
Sounds good.
It should always possible to build only one exact GUI/renderer
combination if desired, of course.
Udo
_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
