Hello strk, Friday, November 10, 2006, 12:24:28 PM, you wrote: s> To complete the picture (so Thomas also understand), s> there *is* some 2.4 version around that *does* have s> that header... Should we mailbomb AGG author ? :P
Pretty much questions (mostly licence-related) remain unanswered in the AGG mailing list. No post from Maxim since October 29 (not that I'm much better *g*)... :-/ Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
