Hello Eric, Tuesday, May 29, 2007, 7:38:23 PM, you wrote: EH> I haven't delved at all into it in any depth, but when I looked at the EH> matrix code last month I did notice one thing I was going to recommend: EH> storing both canonical matrix parameters and the matrix itself and EH> computing the matrix only when necessary. In other words, treating the EH> matrix values as a cache. When matrix canonical values are assigned, all EH> the trigonometric function are recomputed, which is going to be the most EH> expensive operation of the lot.
I'm not sure what you mean. Can you show me the relevant code? Anyway, this is a whole different story as we need to understand where performance dropped lately. When we can improve other parts of Gnash, even better. But we can't compensate a bottleneck by improving other parts of Gnash. I assume some unnecessary bottleneck, of course. Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
