> Reminder: Are you interested in more test cases and should I prepare > them differently?
Sure, we are very interested. Since we don't have a standard spec. for development, we are always looking forward more new testcases. Here is short list that have not been heavily testes in our testsuite: (1) Some action tags like: ActionXXX2, eg. ActionDefineFunction2 (2) Resource collection or GC (3) Scope Chain For (1), I am not sure how to control Ming compiler to produce these tags, so it would be great if you can test them with Mtasc. For(2), I still haven't found an effective way to make self-contained ones. For(3), already tested a lot with Ming, but still need more with different compilers. And if you could control all tags(eg. both action tags and displayList tags) with Mtasc, there are more interesting things to do:) we could disscuss this later. And of course, any other things that fail Gnash or help the underneath model are highly welcome:) zou _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
