My understanding, which may be outdated, is that Git is not at all well-supported on Windows. This may be a problem for some of the developers, especially those working on Cygnal.
Chad On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 08:38 +0200, Bastiaan Jacques wrote: > It seems Savannah is now offering Git support: > > https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4906 > > so instead of finishing Subversion they've decided to go with Git. This > is, as far as I'm concerned, a good thing. A cherrypicking of Git's > features: > > - file renaming support; > - great distributed changeset support; others can easily track your > progress. > - efficiency (I find myself waiting for 'cvs diff' a lot); > - offline commits so it's easy to retrace your steps when you've been > without internet access for a while; > - Pick your own interface: raw git, cogito, stgit, git-gui, ... > > And my personal favourite: no more @#$%^&# failed commits due to changes > other people made in files unrelated to your commit. > > I don't know exactly how this will work with the "upstream" branch, > which I'm assuming will be maintained by Rob. Will we still be able to > merge stuff ourselves, or do we have to wait until Rob pulls from our > repos? > > I'd like to know what other people's feelings on the subject of Git are, > and in case everybody likes it, thoughts on a switching timeline would > be appreciated. > > Bastiaan > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnash-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
