On 04/03/2008, Dossy Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008.03.04, James Northcott / Chief Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We understand the open source model, [...] > > Then I'm assuming your product is also open source, released under the > GPL license?
That makes no sense; their product will have software released under a range of free software licenses, and may include proprietary software too although that would be a shame. I expect that James understands Gnash is under the GPLv3 and what it requires. > This is the reason why I personally use BSD-derivative licenses for my > own projects and am not a huge fan of the GPL. YMMV, of course. The GPL is the most business-friendly license. http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/02/29/the-impact-of-licensing-choice/ explains. -- Regards, Dave _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
