>> I'm sure the Element model fits your RTMP work more, so I'm not >> suggesting to drop it as a whole (unless proven conceptually bogus). I >> just tried to seed the discussion a bit with the REFERENCE and GC >> issues which *may* invalidate the model. It's up to you whether to >> consider that or ignore it. > > I'm not ignoring references,
rob: I think strk meant that you ignored references in your reply to his e-mail. >I'm just not adding support for that *right > now*. My current priority is to finish rtmpget, before launching off on > other things like supporting references. Just saying you can invalidate why > I use Element doesn't mean I should drop everything I'm working on as a top > priority. I have ideas on how to support reference types, but I'll be > happier when I can download videos from the BBC using RTMP. :-) > > While you say I'm ignoring your technical issue, I see you totally ignoring > the bigger picture of what RTMP needs to work, and not being very open > minded about those issues. Somewhere in the middle is probably a perfect > solution. :-) We're not asking you to change what you're coding. We're asking you to talk about it. What is your plan/idea for supporting references? Please share your ideas. It may effect our choice of whether to use your code or not. Also, there's a lot of bright minds on this list, we may have further ideas for you. Best, - Jason _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
