> > A third way, though, could be to implement the codec information class > > from Flash Lite, as Adobe is unlikely to make the two versions of flash > > incompatible. I think the decision needs time, whatever the case. > > I'd be for this third way, what are your concerns about it ? > How does this flash lite interface look like ?
The following return arrays of MIME types: System.capabilities.videoMIMETypes System.capabilitites.MIMETypes System.capabilities.audioMIMETypes It should be noted, though, that a MIME type like video/ogg or audio/ogg only shows that the OGG container can be handled, and doesn't reveal whether codecs for the contained video or audio streams are present, so there's still guesswork involved. The type video/ogg could be Theora/Vorbis, Theora/Speex, Theora/FLAC, Dirac/FLAC, Dirac/Vorbis, MNG/FLAC or OggUVS inside OGG (whatever that is). (See http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MIME_Types_and_File_Extensions) So I'm not convinced that MIME types give much more information than looking at the version string. bwy
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list Gnash-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
