I agree... //Markus On 23 Sep 2008, at 16:36, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, strk wrote:It's a pity if this patch goes discarded IMHO. What do other developers think about putting it in ?I think this patch is a great idea. I have some nits about the implementation, but if it is dependent on --enable-xvideo, I'm all for it. I think having it as a separate GUI is not necessarily the bestidea, however it does achieve abstraction, which I think is crucial forthis patch.My suggestion is just use --enable-xvideo.I concur. That said, it would be great if Gnash would fallback on x11 rendering if xv turns out not to work, even if --enable-xvideo is enabled. But this may be difficult... Bastiaan _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
