FYI. Our largest user base is hurtin'. Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:31:24 +0200 From: "Tomeu Vizoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Flash tests In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: OLPC Development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Id: Software development mailing list <devel.lists.laptop.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2008/9/16 Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi All, > > We need to characterize the performance and support of Flash in release 8.2. > > Technical people in Uruguay did a tests a while ago on the Flash games at > this web site: http://www.minijuegos.com/ > > They used the Gnash shipped with 656 (0.8.1-1) and a Flash plugin > (9.0.124-0). > > They tested Castle Wars: http://www.minijuegos.com/juegos/jugar.php?id=5552 > Freekick Fusion http://www.minijuegos.com/juegos/html/index.php?id=4570 > Hulk Central Smahdown http://www.minijuegos.com/juegos/jugar.php?id=6769 > > I believe those were chosen as examples of Flash capabilities. They weren't > necessarily things the ministry of education wanted to use in class :-) > > In all three Gnash failed completely and Flash ran slowly. > > If anyone has time to try those again with the 8.2 candidate build I would > be very interested in the results. > > Any other comments, URLs or examples about our Flash support are > appreciated. Just tried the Flash 10 RC and it's working much better. Should we ask Uruguay to repeat their tests with that version? Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
