* Benjamin Wolsey -- Friday 24 July 2009: > > +++ libamf/lcshm.cpp > > - if ( (unsigned int)Listener::getBaseAddress() == 0x0 ) > > + if ( Listener::getBaseAddress() == 0x0 )
> The fix for this, as well as being generally much better coding style, > is: Indeed. Just like %p is better coding style than 0x%x. But as this was rejected yesterday, I tried it minimalistic this time. Whatever I do seems wrong. :-P > (If you don't state the obvious in bug reports, there is a risk that no > action will be taken.) Even more obvious than the literal compiler error message (which is all *I* got), *plus* a patch? m. _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
