Oh, so there should be an implementation for RTMP in the IOChannel...right? We where thinking IOChannel returned some pointer to a location where the streams get temporarily stored ( like a cache ). So thats no right, right??
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, strk <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:04:15AM +0530, George Thomas wrote: > > > FILE *newin = fopen(_playpath.c_str(), "r+b"); > > _conn.reset(new tu_file(newin, true)); > > > > The getstream function returns _conn > > > > _conn->write(...,...); > > was used to write > > Is this the right approach or any modifications need to be done? > > Ehm.... I'm afraid you're counting way too much on tu_file class. > No, that's not the right approach, the whole O part of IOChannel > was never used and never implemented either. > > You may want to impement your IOChannel subclass for RTMP. > > --strk; > > () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer > /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnash-dev mailing list > Gnash-dev@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev > -- Vishnu Viswanath C6A Model Engineering College
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list Gnash-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
