On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:48:16AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote: > On 03/15/11 11:41, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > > What's the exact goal ? > > Right now the way we fetch the swfdec tests and it breaks all dist, > deb, and rpm targets in the Makefile if you don't have it already > cloned. It also breaks the tarball as well, since it doesn't have them > included.
This is since Gabriele enabled swfdec testing in 'distcheck', right ? I don't think that was a good idea. > I'm trying to get the release out, and this has been preventing that. > I guess I'll just leave the automatic fetching of swfdec out of the > release, which is the way I have it now. In master, we need to do > something to make this work correctly, and I think forcing everyone to > clone swfdec is not a good idea. At least not the way it "works" now. I agree, in _no_ way should swfdec be a _mandatory_ piece of any gnash use or testing. It is just an additional testing framework we like to run when available. --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list Gnash-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
