On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Gabriele Giacone <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone interested in spending time on replacing std::future with > something working on armv5 too?
Forgive my ignorance: this is the first time I heard that something from std::future didn't work on armv5. Does gnash compile but fail to run correctly, or does it fail to compile on armv5? What part of std::future is at fault? Does this mean we need to fix gcc or glibc? Sincerely, Richard _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
