On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:28:33PM +0200, Tomas Groth wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > >> I tried Gnash and it's good to have such a nice tool. > > >> > > >> One cons: as it was already reported, it is really slow. I read that > > >> it is recommended to get a 3D card to cope with that. > > >> > > >> However these days, all the 3D cards out there require proprietary > > >> drivers to be useful in this regard. > > >> > > >> What would you recommend to get a usable Gnash on a completely free OS? > > >> > > > If 3d acceleration isn't an option, perhaps some serious assembler word > > could > > > do it... As i understand it, that's how macromedia does it. > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > Tomas > > > > Doing some benchs at rendering SWF, I found that AGG > > (http://www.antigrain.com) perform better than Flash, and it's written > > in portable C++ code. > > > > That's interesting, maybe we should have a look at AGG as a possible redering > backend. BTW, how did you run benchmarks?
Or TinyGL maybe? http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/TinyGL/ -- Sylvain _______________________________________________ Gnash mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
