Rob Savoye wrote:
In this case a hypen was used instead of an underbar... All these
different names for the same library are driving me nuts. I guess the
only choice is to make boost.m4 support *all* the names, which seems
silly, but effective. I assume the difference in this case that you
built Boost from source.
That's not the only choice; you can use the solution I provided instead.
You do have your work cut out for you if you pursue the approach you
describe above, though. Have a look at
<http://boost.org/more/getting_started.html>, under the heading "Library
Name". You'll see the library name suffix can consist of the "toolset"
followed potentially by "-mt" followed potentially by one or more
additional letters identifying other "features" the library was built
with. And, joy, it is entirely conceivable that future versions of Boost
could see this list of features grow.
Braden
_______________________________________________
Gnash mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
