Il giorno mer, 08/07/2009 alle 01.05 +0200, crap0101 ha scritto: > Hi! > > reading the bug's page of bug #109 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00109 > cracklib2 seems not free (and it was removed) due its unclear licence. > But this bug is signed like a dupe of bug 99: > http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00099 > where, in Brian's opinion, the Artistic Licence [1], despite its lack of > clearness [2], seems free. > > So, how manage these opposite sentences? [...]
well, gnufs find the newest version of cracklib are been re-licensed under the GNU GPL v2: http://cracklib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cracklib/trunk/cracklib/README-LICENSE?view=markup > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev -- -------------------------------------- me -> http://crap0101.gnu-darwin.org/ -------------------------------------- --
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
