On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:09:54 +0200 Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> wrote:
> Karl Goetz schreef: > > On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:23:25 -0400 > > Richard Stallman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > http://archive.gnewsense.org/gnewsense-deltad/pool/universe/d/d4x/ > >> > http://archive.gnewsense.org/gnewsense-deltad/pool/universe/i/ivman/ > >> > >> Its our 1.x release - the archive is only available for systems > >> still running 1.x/historical interest. > >> > >> Please delete the non-free programs from those archives too. > >> Just being in an old release doesn't make it ok to distribute > >> proprietary software. > > > > Can anyone think of a good reason to keep these repos public facing? > > We may be required to keep the source 'net facing, but the binaries? > > > > I'm wondering this since its meant to be a dead release. If its > > still going to take dev power to maintain, perhaps its easier to > > keep it properly retired. > > I was thinking the same thing. I'd be surprised if anyone uses deltad > anymore. You could ask on the gnewsense-users mailing list for good > form. Message sent. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
