On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:43:59 +0200 Ferdinand Hauck <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:47:39AM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote: > > > I've compiled the linux-2.6.27.7-libre kernel for my Fuloong, this > > > works well together with the Gnewsense metad distribution. The > > > differences between the configurations is available here: > > > > > > http://www.lysator.liu.se/~crono/config.diff > > > > What are the diffs taken between, if not our metad kernel? Linux > > libre upstream builds? > > That is the difference between the kernel configuration files > (.config), not the kernel source itself (admittedly my previous post So far I'm with you. > was not very clear on that). However, I use different options than > what is used for the kernel binary included in metad. The diff might > nevertheless be useful to indicate which settings needs to be changed > when building a kernel for the Fuloong, even though this is rather > straightforward. This left me confused. My question: has the configuration file contents changed between metad and what you diffed? (the options themselves, not what they are set to). > The kernel source package included in metad was used without changes. > This is why I believe it would be worth the effort to support the > Fuloong as well. This makes me suspect they have not changed, so that makes life a little easier ;) kk > Best, > Ferdinand > -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
