On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:32:31 +0100 ben <[email protected]> wrote:
> Karl Goetz wrote: > > * Changed the notice in debian/copyright regarding the right to > > distribute modified binaries, now blessed by Mark "Just Because > > I'm A CG Genius Doesn't Mean I'm Not A Stubborn Arsehole" Kilgard. > > (Closes: #131997) > > > > I wonder if this means we can also distribute glut under the same > > terms (since hes said thats what was intended), or if we need to be > > careful with it too. > > What makes you think that distribution under the same terms is not > possible? That upstream (Mark) is extremely hostile, it makes me a bit iffy. More importantly (in my mind) was weather that 'licence clarification' counted for all works he produced, or just glut. > I quote from [1]: > > || Would it be possible for you to just make it absolutely clear that > || everyone's allowed to use, copy, and modify (and distribute their > || modifications) of libglut? > > || Just quoting the above and replying "Yes, that's fine" or similar > || would be > || okay. > > | Yes, that's fine. > > It clearly says "everyone". But perhaps that's not what you're > thinking about? I guess I'm being overly worried (justified or not). kk > ben > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=131997#71 > -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
