Hi all, I've started a list of our freedom bugs, and its status upstream. I've only got about half our freedom bugs in the list, but it is a start. Hopefully one someone else is willing to take on to finish. If someone else wants to help work on this, the following would be helpful (in this order): - put it in a wiki page somewhere - put it in a table ? - email the list (so i can find it) - find all other gns bug reports about freedom - find out if they are fixed upstream/wontfix upstream - if they are open, link to the upstream bug - extra references for/against a bugs status. - etc etc.
http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00321 already removed upstream http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00365 discovery of kilgard code, could get big fast http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00219 fixed upstream http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00242 FIXME: How? if 30% of files are missing licences, thats big. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00248 FIXME: texlive. are we still waiting on a licence grant? http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00251 proper fix would involve rebuilding every package which references non-free software. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00363 needinfo. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00212 can't be copyrightable... surely. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00214 fixed upstream (its in contrib) http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00234 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509287 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00236 needinfo http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00243 linux-libre considers this notabug (I'm unconvinced) http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00287 samgee declared 'seems ok' http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00288 fixed upstream. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00289 not in debian http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00290 debian considers artistic licence ok. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00291 debian considers artistic licence ok. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00292 fixed upstream http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00300 fixed upstream (its in non-free) http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00305 fixed upstream http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514742 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00308 not sure if debian would consider this a bug. (recommending proprietary frimware) http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00318 needs better references before filing in debian. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00319 upstream wontfix http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01646.html http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00323 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559444 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00333 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559445 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00336 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559448 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00345 fixed upstream http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00346 fixed upstream (openjdk) http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00351 partly fixed upstream, forwarded http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559443 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00352 seems to be uncopyrightable data http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00353 fixed upstream( removed) http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00354 not sure if debian would consider this a bug. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00355 not sure if debian would consider this a bug. http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00360 there is a test for it in source, but the packages don't depend on it... reinclude? http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00362 More killgard code. Two other bugs I filed upstream without a bug to attach them to: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559425 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559446 -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
