On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:12:59 +1030 Karl Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:13:55 +0100 > Graziano <[email protected]> wrote: > > > gNewSense metad mipsel on the Lemote Yeeloong. > > > > aptitude update > > aptitude dist-upgrade > > > > the following packages are BROKEN: > > libpurple0 pidgin > > > the following packages will be updated: > > pidgin-data > > > > the following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > > libpurple0: depends on pidgin-data (< 2.4.3-z) but 2.6.5-2~bpo50+1 > > is going to be installed. > > > > pidgin: depends on: pidgin-data (< 2.4.3-z) but 2.6.5-2~bpo50+1 is > > going to be installed. Having looked at it again, I'm a bit confused by this. All three binary packages come from the same source package. Unless the mirror has only picked up -data and not libpurple0/pidgin, this seems like a very strange situation. > > The following actions will allow to meet those dependencies: > > > > Remove these packages: > > > > libpurple0 > > pidgin > > > > Leave those dependencies unmet: > > gnome recommends empathy | pidgin > > Score is -372 Please include 'aptitude why pidgin-data` when you file the bug report. kk > > It seems only the single package has been backported and not its > > dependencies. > > maybe that dependency hasn't built on mipsel. I did check on i386 to > make sure all the dependencies were met before adding to the > backport list. > > > But I may be wrong. > > > > I think it was something useful to report anyway. > > to the bts. > kk. > > -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group -- Due to a bug of some sort in claws-mail I sent a pile of old email to goodness knows where. Apologies if you received some of it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
