Dear David, we thank the AMS for the decision to release AMS-LaTeX under LPPL in the future.
Is there any possibility to release the CURRENT AMS-LaTeX version under the same license, the LPPL? In this way the packages that are distributed at the moment could simply be updated with the new license. Otherwise the package risks to be removed, since its license still does not conform with the gNewSense guidelines. Greetings, Benedikt David M. Jones wrote: > Benedikt, > > I'm very happy to report that our Publisher has authorized us to adopt > the LPPL for future releases of AMS-LaTeX. > > Could you please forward our sincere thanks to the members of the > gnewsense list for providing us with the type of specific critiques > and arguments that we needed to motivate this change in policy? And > most especially, thank you once again for facilitating this. > > I'll update the draft statement that I sent on September 17 to refer > to the LPPL and add it to the current AMS-LaTeX distribution early > next week. > > Best wishes, > David. _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
