Quoting Karl Goetz <[email protected]>:
Are you planning to provide fixed packages for the entire program (eg,
a new gcc package), or just a deb of the doco to sit beside it?
Just a deb for the doco.
I think I will make a meta-package called `gnu-doc' having
`binutils-doc' and the like as dependencies. That way, Richard will be
able to have all GNU doc with one command, while people working with,
say `gawk', will only have to install `gawk-doc'.
Do you think I better have to work on files from:
- `apt-get source $SOFTWARE-doc' from metad,
- or source files from gnu.org (metad version number)?
Given those informations, do you think I better have to just edit
the script to copy html files and directory recursively from
{binutils,gcc,gdb} website to a directory of the user calling the
script? In this case, in which user's directory should I copy this
html doc?
I would suggest putting the info files in a bzr repo, and not scraping
off the html.
binutils, gcc and gdb info files are already on
http://bzr.savannah.org/r/gnewsense/docs.
Christophe
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
gNewSense-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
