On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, 21:34:00 LHST, Marek Buras <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:54:36PM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote: > > If you could double check and make sure there is an explicit licence > > statement - pd or not - that would be excellent. Would be embarassing > > to make the package not free by mistake :) > > > > I couldn't find any licensing information about this file (besides the > comment inside it), but I've sent an e-mail to Graeme Gill - the author > - asking about it and permission to use it. > > > As long as the profiles are under a compatible licence you should be > > fine. Note that being a repack it'll need the +fsdg suffix and the > > copyright info updated with your changes. > > What kind of copyright information should it be? Is something like this: > ---------- 8< ----------- > Files: /path/to/this/sRGB.icm > License: Public domain (if it's PD indeed) > This file has been downloaded from ... > ---------- 8< ----------- > in the licence bit include the email from upstream where they say its pd, otherwise pretty muvh that :) _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
