On Thu, 27 Dec 2012, 02:54:35 LHST, Marek Buras <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:56:14AM +0100, Sam Geeraerts wrote: > > My plan is to import GFDL packages from Debian non-free. That should be > > a lot less work than merging docs into the main packages. > > > > This is much better idea. We can forget what I posted earlier ;) i have not looked at this packaging but in some cases you may be able to update get-orig-source to stop it stripping the docs to start with. Then install the docs as normal. > > I did a quick search and only found it in Sid. I learned from our work > > on Metad that backporting gets messy very quickly. What seems at first > > like an innocent package with few dependencies to be resolved often > > turns out needing a whole chain of binary and build dependencies, > > potentially all the way down to libc. Is there a compelling reason to > > have Emacs 24.2 in Parkes? > files with vim ;D). 23.2 with Debian patches isn't broken, so there's no > need to fix anything. If other, more skilled emacs users have nothing to > add about 24.2, we can forget about my questions ;) There are probably > more important tasks to complete. Are they co installable? Thanks, kk _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
