Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> writes: > Both are a lot of work, but the second is more work than the first. Our > current implementation is imperfect (e.g. r8169 doesn't work), but I > don't see the advantage of choosing the second option. >
I understand and I don't even find current imlementation that inconvenient (both have their drawbacks). Just asked to make sure if there is other (maybe better/easier) way of doing things. Anyway I've tested that kernel built the way described earlier and I consider RTL8169 support stable. I've looked at r8169.c to make sure it really doesn't contain any code that tries to load non free firmware and everything is "pure" there. So, is it okay to include those patches and update the package to 46gnewsense2? Or maybe there is more work to do and you need help with something? Happy hacking! -- Marek Buras cyfr0n (at) go2.pl _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
