2013/8/17 rsiddharth <[email protected]>

[...]


> Also, we need to have consensus on, what/what not, to document in the
> gNewSense Wiki.
>

That was going to be my next proposal: to limit the scope of documentation.
Although I already did a long time ago [5]


>
> For instance, I feel the Documentation for GIMP[3], Emacs[4]
> redundant, as the official documentation for these packages are good
> enough.
>
> I think, the Wiki must contain *only* gNewSense specific
> documentation, that way we can make good use of time & space.
>

I totally agree with that. Applications have their own manuals, and if
there's
any useful application without manual I think it's better to help that
application
directly rather than creating documentation for it in gNewSense wiki.


>
>
> [3]: http://gnewsense.org/Documentation/GIMP
> [4]: http://gnewsense.org/Documentation/Emacs
>

[5]: http://www.gnewsense.org/DocumentationSet


>
> Thanks for paying heed.
> --
> rsiddharth <http://rsiddharth.ninth.su>
> gpg public key: http://rsiddharth.ninth.su/rsd-pub-key.asc
> fingerprint: 7E7E 9403 8F39 796E D9AB  5923 E867 2A45 B6AD 4643
>
> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
>
>


-- 
Felipe Lopez
http://sirgazil.info/
_______________________________________________
gNewSense-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev

Reply via email to