Op Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:08:02 -0400 schreef dww <[email protected]>: > I investigated the list of packages in the cleaned section Parkes.yaml > with Wheezy source. Next to the package name I indicated yes if fixed > in Wheezy, no if not and commented where there were complications. > Sam, you may want to respond to those comments.
Many thanks. > batik: I believe yes based on the changes in debian/new-upstream > in Wheezy, you may want to double check, > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/batik/batik_1.7 > +dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz Looks good. > db4.7: appears no, I guess you have not heard from Oracle about > mt19937db.c yet about upgrading the Artistic licenxe > # savannah 29840 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 29840 > info: null I haven't. I will ask them again. > db5.1 was added in Wheezy same issue as db4.7 and db4.8. OK. > debian-faq: apparently no, I found no > http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/gnewsense/packages-parkes/debian-faq/ > page as indicated in the debian/control file. > # savannah 37992 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 37992 > info: null I must have forgotten to push it to the bzr repo. I'll fix that. > doc-linux: I cannot find the doc-linux package in Wheezy or the > name of the package that contains the content but I presume it is not > fixed. > # savannah 40741 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 40741 > info: null Was removed after Squeeze release. See news in QA page [1] > doc-linux-fr was updated in Wheezy, so it will need to be fixed if > it builds. Ack. > iceweasel: no, but I did not quite understand the discussion in > the bug, is there a direct patch to getting icecat? > # savannah 28177 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 28177 > info: null We cherrypick (some of) Icecat's changes. I believe there's quite a big difference between Squeeze's and Wheezy's Iceweasel, so this will need some work. > kdebase: no appears to be in kde-baseapps in Wheezy > # savannah 33695, savannah 39678 > bug_ref: *sv > id: [39054, 39678] > info: null Ack. > lensfun: no, file is now in /lensfun-0.2.5/build/tibs/ > # savannah 41007 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 41007 > info: null Ack. > liferea: no, but they moved the location of the browser list in > code. > # savannah 33639 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 33639 > info: null OK. > linux-2.6: no, Wheezy is on linux-3.2 so I am sure it will have to > be cleaned. > # ? > bug_ref: null > id: null > info: null > > linux-latest-2.6: no, Wheezy is on linux-3.2 so I am sure it will > have to be cleaned. > # savannah 38001 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 38001 > info: null I believe it's pretty clean in itself, maybe changing only the request_firmware calls is sufficient. > live-build: yes, as far as I can determine > # savannah 38898 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 38898 > info: null Cool. > openbox-themes: no, also Artistic License 2.0 needs to be added to > base-files > # savannah 39630 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 39630 > info: null And still the same in unstable last time I checked. > psutils: yes > # savannah 35791 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 35791 > info: null Nice. > screenlets: Wheezy did a fix by adding text to debian/copyright > however that did not fix the upstream LICENSE file. > # savannah 32239 > bug_ref: *sv > id: 32239 > info: null Hm, sloppy. > texlive-extra: looks like the non free fonts are gone (30988), > but I could not find a Debian bug for it that indicates it was fixed, > however, looks like the IEEEtran.bst file is still installed (39679) > and still refers to the Artistic 1.0 license. > # savannah 30988, savannah 39679 > bug_ref: *sv > id: [30988, 39679] > info: null Ack. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/doc-linux.html _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
