El mié, 15-11-2006 a las 10:03 +0100, Andreas K. Foerster wrote: > Am Mittwoch, dem 15. Nov 2006 schrieb Jorge Rodríquez: > > > Whitch is the target user of gsn? the normal user of ???linux??? will not > > use gns. > > > > The philosophy of gns is radical, is not ???open source???, is for radical > > users (like I) > > Well, I see gNewSense not as a system to use myself, but as a means to > promote Free Software, by giving it to others. (hint: Christmas comming) > > So, for me wine is less a problem than firefox. > > Firefox is actively promoting unfree extensions and plugins, while wine > and ndiswrapper just *offer* more possibilities, more capabilities. > Offering more possibilities makes Free Software look good, promoting > unfree software makes Free Software look bad.
In this question, I am not neutral, I am pro-GNU, I want one distro activist. Is gns for my? I see gNewSense not (only) as a system to use myself, but (also) as a means to promote (GeNUine) Free Software, by giving (example). For my, the principles are more importants that the functionality. I want that gns is a MORAL REFERENCE. A happy user of gns. _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
