Well, I've done a little digging, and I found this gem from the wikipedia article on MP3:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3 It's not necessarily definitive, but let's start somewhere. "Additionally, patent holders declined to enforce license fees on open source decoders, allowing many free MP3 decoders to develop. Furthermore, while attempts have been made to discourage distribution of encoder binaries, Thomson has stated that individuals using free MP3 encoders are not required to pay fees. Thus while patent fees have been an issue for companies attempting to use MP3, they have not meaningfully impacted users, allowing the format to grow in popularity." So basically, were gNS to include a free MP3 encoder, there's no licensing fee...but if any encoder/decoder is included, charging a fee might be difficult for anyone downstream. I'm not sure which definition of free Thomson used. I doubt it's the one we're accustomed to (Free as in Speech). Also examine http://www.mp3licensing.com/ I think we cannot include it. I assume the Ubuntu folk came to this very same conclusion for the very same reasons. bk The patents seem to expire in the US in 2010. In the meantime, I'll use Ogg Vorbis. (The wikipedia article states that the patent issue is partially what spawned all of the competing formats.) _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
