Karl Goetz wrote: > > i find "Soft[ware]modem" much easier to say then w32modem ;)
I didn't propose "w32modem" -- w32 should be used in general sense, i.e. "A w32 port for that program", "The w32 version fails to build". "Soft[ware]modem" is a confusing word, because it presumes that the modem could run with free software, which is not the case. The proper term for these nefarious devices is "Lose-modem", see http://fsfeurope.org/documents/rms-fs-2006-03-09.en.html#today-we-have-enemies _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
