> That is not my understanding of the definition of free software. For > instance, the FSF says of the Aladdin Free Public License, "Despite its > name, this is not a free software license because it does not allow > charging for distribution". In general, the FSF encourages the selling > of free software, individually and in aggregate.
Since the creator had placed it under a free software license and he/she placed it under a non-commercial distribution copyright, we can assumed he/she had dual licensed the software. Regards Koh Choon Lin Singapore GNU Group _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
