Paul O'Malley wrote: > Matthew Flaschen wrote: >> Daniel Boza wrote: >>> [RFR] (Request For Review) >>> >>> This is used when the translation is finished and you are requesting >>> others to review it. Sometimes a RFR2 can follow if big chances have been >>> made to the document. If a person who reviewed the document didn't find any >>> mistakes he should tell so. >> I don't think we need a review every time. That could be overkill, and >> there's always the option of removing/revising a bad translation later. >> >> Matt Flaschen > Just a couple of thoughts on this thing: > General guidelines for the gNewSense site are as follows: > While on wiki it is beta, when "stable" it is on www?
as far as translations for the main part of the site go that idea is fine. > > If we get people to "read and check your work" and gpg sign it perhaps > then it should be moved to the www. gpg signing sounds like a lot of work, i'd think just as effective is someone adding their name to to the bottom of the page basically saying 'i reviewed this and i find its acceptable' > So when you are finished with something or see something is finished gpg > sign it. Then ping which ever mailing point is being used for > translations with the wiki page. If people like the translation they too > can sign it. > > These are just ideas, anyone else for a yes or no? > > > Regards, > > Paul > -- Karl Goetz User of gNewSense: Free as in Freedom - http://www.gnewsense.org Australian Ubuntu users team - http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam User of Debian, The Universal Operating System - http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
