I'm not sure if this is breaking a format, I don't see anything established here.
On http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/PackagesInMain I put a brief summary of libf which seems to be similar to the other summaries. On http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/MainLibf itself I've added two new sub-headings: Relevant Bugs and Actions Taken - I hadn't seen anything like this so I made it up. :P -Kevin On 7/7/07, Chris Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, all. More progress is being made with Package Freedom Verification. Could I ask people who are being good enough to spend time on this project, to put a short summary next to the letter/s they are working on. This is already happening in some cases, which is great. All status summaries should have the date of the update, whether the list is 100% free, if not, something to reflect this, such as three packages suspected to be non-free. If packages are suspected to be non-free, then as mentioned earlier, these packages need to be added to the "Suspected non-free" page, and a bug raised against the package. Bottom-line: Great work being done, and it would be helpful if you could put a short summary for your work. Many thanks- keep it up. Cheers, Chris.
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
