On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 22:26 -0500, Kevin Dean wrote: > vrms isn't a perfect too, especially when we're looking as deeply at > everything as is done in gNewSense. > > The Gentium fonts have come up before on this list and they were > confirmed to be Free.
I still maintain vrms should be removed from gnewsense. kk > > -Kevin > > On Dec 15, 2007 1:17 PM, marco.chieppa-crap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, i have already installed gNS on my 2nd pc (a laptop). > > after that, i' had installing the 'vrms' package. It find a > > non-fre package, a font: > > > > vrms: ERROR- Badly formed dpkg-status entry #1083! > > pkg=[emacs], pkgstatus=[install ok installed], > > section=[] > > Non-free packages installed on marco-laptop > > > > ttf-gentium Gentium TrueType font > > > > 1 non-free packages, 0.1% of 1112 installed packages. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > > > > the question: is vrms wrong or is that font really non-free? > > > > thanks > > marco > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gNewSense-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users -- Karl Goetz, Debian user / Ubuntu contributor / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
