On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:24 -0400, Kurt von Finck wrote: > Chris Andrew wrote: > > Karl, > > > > Nothing whatsoever against Gobuntu, but why not just file the bugs > > with the related package maintainer? > > I think the idea is to categorize things that Gobuntu would classify as > bugs because of licensing, but that Ubuntu would include to provide > functionality to the widest subset of users.
Thats more or less it. > > > I found some guidelines here for reporting kernel bugs: > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/reporting-bugs.html Potentially useful link - has it been added to either projects wikis/doco? > > I think the modules and packages in question here are not part of the > mainline Linux kernel. Until we assure they are, IMO we should treat > them as Gobuntu bugs first, Ubuntu second, and upstreams as the final > port of call. Yeah. And since i'm not much good at telling where a particular bit of code comes into the picture, i file it where it was reported - in Ubuntu. kk > > > Isn't Launchpad non-free? > > So is GMail. ;) > -- Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
