As I said before, I suggest that we all use the same URL, although uploading the kernel image to the site is an option, I think it is a less elegant solution.
Any more opinions are welcomed, before finalizing this decision. Thanks, Chris. On 21/03/2008, crap0101 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Il giorno ven, 21/03/2008 alle 08.28 +0000, Chris Andrew ha scritto: > > > Luis, > > > > Thanks for your comment. Marco, what do you think? > > > > I think it may be a good idea to perhaps have the kernel version > > uploaded to the site, so that everyone knows they are checking the > > same release. I thought that by having a URL pointing to the kernel > > version, that would be sufficient. > > > > > hi! > > yes, i agree with this. I'd downloaded a different version (X.X.-8-13) > but maybe is better (to all) to use this > http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz > > true? > > thanks, > marco > > > > -- Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ A great GNU/Linux distro: http://wiki.gnewsense.org/ _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
