> After thinking this a bit more I'm not so sure anymore whether it is > meant to mean "except as part of a (product) or (program developed by > the user)" or "except as part of a (product or program) developed by > the user" > > In a case like this shouldn't gNS contact the copyright holder(s) > instead of deciding to interpret the license favorably for gNS?
I think so. IMO, "(product) or (program developed by the user)" is highly unlikely. "Product" is just about devoid of meaning. We would need for the copyright holder to give an explicit answer about granting wider rights. _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
