> I have found a thread about it on the debian-legal mailing list [1], ... > It's probably best to contact the FSF about what is trivial and what > isn't. If we have to remove it, there's plenty of alternatives to > choose from. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/11/msg00248.html > [2] http://www.scalabium.com/faq/dct0136.htm > [3] http://www.brics.dk/~btools/ELI/libelf-0.6.4/lib/hash.c
Wow, Sam, thanks for, uh, doing my work for me. :) I have made a footnote on the KFV entry for this file, and so the linux/net section is finally done. In the meantime I will seek advice from the FSF about this and, thanks to Sam, will figure out how to better use the info from debian-legal for future KFV work. Bake P.S. Thanks for updating KFV Flow -- it looks great. :) _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
