Chris Andrew wrote: > Lee and I have asked Christophe (Pitof) to act as the deputy for the > _Kernel Freedom Verification KFV summary statistics table_ work; > Christophe has kindly accepted. This will mean that he will > co-ordinate the maintenance of this work, so that everything is up to > date for the weekly summary. Additionally, this will allow everyone > to see how well the kernel checking is going. > > I hope everyone will help Christophe, should he need it.
Cool - I signed up as owner to do summary statistics on some base directories that said "NEED ADOPTING" or something like that before noticing this message - should those be transfered to one of you guys? If not, I'm happy to do it - is it manual at this point? I vaguely remember seeing a reference to a stats.sh script somewhere, but I can't find it now. Manually looking through the wiki for things that needed to be done, it looks like 100% of the files have now been looked at, and there are just a few files with open questions regarding their freedom, and a few that have been verified as non-free. So is it just waiting and seeing what happens to the questionable files at this point, or can we go ahead with a preliminary build of the modules without the known-bad and questionable files, to get a lot of people's sound etc. working again? If we can do that, is any builder script hacking help needed? > Work is always available, should people feel they would like to push > gNS forward in the future. Just have a look at this evolving list: > > http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/CurrentProjects I put my name next to some things I / the Free Software Foundation are interested in helping with sooner rather than later - specifically, we (and anyone else who wants to run gNS on servers) really need 64-bit support. -- Danny Clark # Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation # http://www.fsf.org # http://opensysadmin.com _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
