On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:04 PM, James Freer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I have recently researched forums and i'd say the leading two are
> phpBB and SMF (simple machines forum). SMF i'd say is the better as it
> offers more features and customisation than even some of the paid for
> ones.
>
> http://www.simplemachines.org/
>

This conversation has been had before, I haven't change my mind.
The effort to maintain an additional piece of software and an RDBMS isn't
currently worth it.

Brian

>
>
> 2008/8/20 Ali Gunduz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think it is time to change the current forum configuration and have a
> more
> > 'conventional' forum. I suggest phpBB but feel free to suggest another if
> > there are practical or license issues.
> >
> > I think such a change is necessary because:
> >
> > 1- Threads can be grouped in categories
> > 2- Tags for quotes, code lines, images, in-text url's
> > 3- Standart sub-thread fields, for example to list user's hardware
> > 4- Most importantly, the ability to edit previous posts, which makes it
> > possible for
> >     a) correct mistakes instead of redundant correction/improvement
> messages
> > (makes it easier to follow)
> >     b) make it a playground for tutorials before submitted to the wiki
> >
> > However, it also brings some challenges (other than finding someone to
> spend
> > time on it):
> >
> > 1- archiving current forum threads
> > 2- integrating current users/profiles
> > 3- keeping a design consistency in means of color scheme and whatnot
> >
> > gnufs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gNewSense-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
>
_______________________________________________
gNewSense-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users

Reply via email to