> > Unless there is some clear basis to argue that a free license applies > > to these files, they are non-free. > > > > I would expect that the lack of a license notice is unintentional and > > that the developers of these files will add a license notice when they > > see a bug report about this.
Did you ask RMS about programs with no license headers or programs that happen to not include a copy of the license? If GPL headers are there, then the author has probably just forgotten to include a copy of the license and usually a note will clear that up. If you've got programs with no headers at all or just a smattering of BSD and MIT, then I don't think you can assume that those programs are free. _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
