About the files in the kernel, which contain copyright statements but no
license information -- I'm persuaded by Sam Geeraert's rationale for not
worrying about them:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-users/2008-12/msg00027.html
As he says, things which are clearly proprietary would be of higher
priority. That said, it might be worthwhile to come back to this issue
later. That would be easier if we flagged the files now.
Does anyone with Lisp skills feel like adding a new license type option to
the KFV script for "Copyright, but no license, assumed to be GPLv2."? Or
would anyone object if I made that change?
http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Kernel/Kfv-script
_______________________________________________
gNewSense-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
