On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:11:33 +1800 "Matthew Reath" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Karl Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:26:55 +1800 > > "Matthew Reath" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I agree on this one. gNewSense is and should be 100% free. Thats > > > the entire point of the distribution. Once its no longer 100% > > > free for any reason we might as well be using Ubuntu, they would > > > essentially be the same. > > > > Don't be so melodramatic. > > > Its not melodramatic its idealistic. I'm just trying to make a point. > gNewSense in itself is an idealistic distribution. > But in making your point your exaggerating to the extent that your original point is lost. > > > So I'm in agreement that this package should be removed until it > > > can be clarified whether its free or non-free. > > > > svn commit 222, according to the bug report. > > Some days ago. > > kk > > > Perfect. I'm sure we'll find a free alternative. > I believe cpio works as a replacement. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian user / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
