On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:42:02 +1030 Karl Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:33:14 +0100 > [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi Luis, > > Hi both, > (I've moved pitof's post to the bottom). > > > > > > > Another thing I think is important is that the pages should follow > > > the W3C recommendations for markup (XHTML) and style (CSS). > > > Currently, some of (or all?) > > > the pages of the website don't validate: > > > > > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gnewsense.org%2F&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.gnewsense.org%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0> > > > > > > I'd like to hear What you think about my proposal. > > I see no good reason for us to try and make pmwiki produce valid > markup. > After saying that, I wondered how much work it would be to get us validating. Turns out the errors we have seem to be largely from the skin itself. 4 of them are the skin being stupid, so they are now fixed. If you want to work out a fix for the last one, I'm happy to provide you with the skin in a tar. So while I don't take back my comment I'll add a proviso - "Its not our job to make it produce valid markup, but we may as well aim for it if its easy" ;) kk > If we were to write our own website, then yes, There would be a call > for it to be valid ([x]html, css and accessible.) > -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian user / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
