crap0101 wrote: > Il giorno ven, 05/06/2009 alle 03.30 +0200, crap0101 ha scritto: > > It seems free, but the point `5.' is quite strange > > Again, a mistake! i mean poin 4, not point 5. Also, on > #gnewsense Quadduc raise a question on point 6.
4 definitely makes this license non-free, look at "Open Public License" and "Old license of ksh93" here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license- list.html#NonFreeSoftwareLicense _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
