On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:05:05 +0200 Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> wrote:
> Karl Goetz schreef: > > On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:12:52 +0200 > > crap0101 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Looking in the repos i see firefox (package 'firefox-2') is still > >> present. We don't should remove it? > >> > >> I'm asking this because reading > >> http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00150 > >> i don't understand if is good have it in the repos or not. > > > > IIRC it should be removed. Like ndiswrapper, I think its only there > > because Builder isnt processing it correctly come remove time. > > kk > > I think I found out why: do-update has the following line > > DONT_CHROOT=1 ensure_updated firefox-2.0 firefox-2.0 $RELEASE$i > "./remove-package firefox-2.0" '' > > which is like the one for Firefox 3, but with s/3/2/g. But the > package name for FF 3 is firefox-3.0, whereas the package name for FF > 2 is firefox-2. So I think that line should be > > DONT_CHROOT=1 ensure_updated firefox-2 firefox-2 $RELEASE$i > "./remove-package firefox-2" '' Well spotted. Apon further investigation, it looks like the source package 'firefox' builds the binary 'firefox-2', and the source 'firefox-3.0' builds the binary 'firefox'. Nothing confusing there at all! kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
